Effectiveness of Random and Focused Review in Detecting Surgical Pathology Error
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Effectiveness of random and focused review in detecting surgical pathology error.
Different error detection methods yield different error proportions and have variable benefits for surgical pathology divisions with limited resources. We performed a nonconcurrent cohort study at a large institution that practices subspecialty surgical pathology sign-out to compare the effectiveness and usefulness of error detection using a targeted 5% random review process and a focused revie...
متن کاملError reduction in surgical pathology.
CONTEXT Because of its complex nature, surgical pathology practice is inherently error prone. Currently, there is pressure to reduce errors in medicine, including pathology. OBJECTIVE To review factors that contribute to errors and to discuss error-reduction strategies. DESIGN Literature review. RESULTS Multiple factors contribute to errors in medicine, including variable input, complexit...
متن کاملThe Landscape of Error in Surgical Pathology
Error: In everyday language, error is getting things wrong, usually in relation to aims and purposes [67]. There is a different technical use of the term error in statistics [27]. For statisticians, error means differences in repeated measurements. These measurement differences arise from either random variation or bias. Random variation causes inconsistent differences between measurements; bia...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: American Journal of Clinical Pathology
سال: 2008
ISSN: 0002-9173,1943-7722
DOI: 10.1309/ajcppia5d7mykdwf